Young People Know Their Feeds Are Broken. Here's What They're Asking for Instead.

May 20, 2026

The Or Initiative team interviewed teens in New York City and Southern California last year to learn how young people decide what to trust online about current events and contentious topics, and how they talk (and don’t talk) about those issues with peers.

We’re kicking off our wORks in Progress series with 4 key findings from our interviews with more than 100 middle school, high school, and college students, educators, school leaders, and curriculum developers. See our recent report for more: Coming of Age in Polarized Times: Teaching Civil Discourse in a Digital Era.

Or Initiative Works In Progress

By Michael H. Levine and Vikki Katz

"I get a lot of my news from social media… if I read something and I'm like, 'Oh, this is interesting,' then I look it up because I want to make sure I'm learning things that are real and true. A lot of what I've learned about Israel and Palestine has been shaped by social media." — Drew, 11th grade, NYC

Teens making observations like this one usually produces eye-rolls or low-grade panic from adults about a TikTok-educated generation. It’s a reaction that makes sense. It would undoubtedly be better if young people were learning about complex issues from a diverse set of verified sources and engaging in clarifying debates with their peers, teachers, and other trusted adults.

The middle school, high school, and college students we interviewed would agree that TikTok or other popular  social media forms like Instagram are not the best place to learn about the world. But they also feel they are navigating an information environment that is profoundly broken.

What we found when we listened to them is missing from the media coverage and rhetoric around young people and tech: this is not a generation of passive victims of algorithmic manipulation. They know they are subject to some amount of active steering that shapes their sentiments. They know they seldom hear the full story.

They describe trying to break out by "hacking" their feeds — liking content on both sides of an issue, blocking accounts, saving creators whose perspectives challenge them — in deliberate attempts to resist the echo chambers they know algorithms will build around them. As Andrew, an 11th grader in SoCal, explained: "I save a bit of everything: things I like, things I hate… to try to make it so my feed shows a bit more of each side." They understand that outrage gets amplified and that moderates get drowned out.

 

Knowing how the game works doesn't make the young people we talk to everyday immune to it. The same teens who demonstrated sophisticated algorithmic awareness also told us they don't know how to determine what is true anymore. When we asked one student how he decides if something he sees is accurate, he replied: "It's very hard to come across what information is actually true, because I don't think anyone really knows."

Young people are digitally sophisticated AND they are tired and oversaturated by a constant flood of information. In that exhaustion, many have adopted a fallback strategy we call majority rules — if they see the same claim repeated across multiple posts, they take it as more likely to be true. It's an earnest attempt to apply a basic evidentiary principle. It's also exactly how algorithmic amplification of misinformation works.

The broken information systems are acutely visible in how young people have encountered the Middle East conflict after October 7, 2023. This was most teens’ first “social media war,” with graphic and contested content arriving unfiltered in the two minutes they scrolled between class periods. Jewish students described an algorithm that knew they were Jewish — pushing Middle East content onto their feeds relentlessly, turning their phones into spaces where their identity, safety, and sense of belonging were suddenly on trial.

Students with no direct connection to the conflict found themselves caught between two sets of certainties that admitted no middle ground. As Milo, an 11th grader with no ties to the region, put it: "It's just too extreme; I can't even form an opinion because all I see is Israel deserves to invade [Gaza] because Hamas invaded first and that Israel can't do this because people are suffering. What's really even happening?"

What Milo is describing is a knowledge crisis: young people are learning about the world in their out-of-school time on a parallel track to what they learn in school. They get taught digital citizenship in class, and watch the most uncivil behavior play out online. The content they learn in class, and rules about evidence and verification, seldom translate into their time in their feeds.

We think it is time to make those learning tracks intersect intentionally and meaningfully. Wouldn’t it be better for young people to know that they can bring their questions about what they are seeing in their feeds to adults who are prepared to help them make sense of it?

For many students we interviewed, classrooms are the only place left where it feels possible to ask real questions and where changing your mind is still permitted. Classrooms are where the accountability of face-to-face conversation — as one student put it, where "you can't just shut your brain off and walk away from me," — replaces the anonymity that digital spaces reward.

Young people’s digital lives are not a problem to be solved; they bring many assets to how they are building identity, encountering the world, and making sense of things that matter deeply to them in those spaces. The challenge is to help them do that work more wisely — to turn what they are already doing, imperfectly, into genuine civic learning about the most pressing issues for our country and our world, together.

At Or Initiative, we are hard at work on curriculum resources that will be the connective tissue between their online experiences and their classrooms, to make it easier for teachers to support students in developing digital discernment, with regular classroom practice that creates enduring habits and uses up-to-date social media content. We’re not interested in teaching students what to think about current events and contentious topics—but we are invested in teaching them how to think, and how to collaborate with their peers to understand all the perspectives on issues that deserve them. We’re helping educators to meet students where they already are — curious, sophisticated, and hungry for spaces where complexity is welcomed.

We're building for that; want to learn more? Join us at orinitiative.org.

Enjoyed this article?

Follow us on LinkedIn and YouTube to never miss an update.